Madam Chair, my thanks to Mr. Nantel for his comments. We are doing constructive work. This bill has received the support of three parties and of a number of members in the House of Commons. We are in favour of the bill. However, I come back to the point I made earlier. The Canadian Museum of History, which we can consider to be the steward of heritage, has provided comments, clause by clause, on the clauses of the proposed bill.
As Mr. Nantel just mentioned, the intent of the bill is good, but as is often said, the devil is in the details. Let us take, for example, clause 3, which is in the document presented to us. The Canadian Museum of History has proposed two changes to the original text.