Evidence of meeting #149 for Canadian Heritage in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was line.
A video is available from Parliament.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Julie Dabrusin
Does that work for you, Ms. McLeod, in being able to have a discussion about the topic?
Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo, CPC
I think it's more up to the clerk to advise us.
Legislative Clerk
If you want to propose amendment 10.1, it would become the new clause 24.1.
NDP
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Julie Dabrusin
All right. This is the way it will have to happen. We will have to pass through clause 24 first before we can do clause 24.1. There's a leap of everyone at this table understanding where it's going, because we'll have to carry clause 24—
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Julie Dabrusin
No, I don't need unanimous consent to carry clause 24 as amended, if it was amended—
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Julie Dabrusin
That would carry through. Then we would continue the discussion, knowing that we're going to have an amendment for clause 24.1, a new clause. All right?
Shall clause 24 as amended carry?
(Clause 24 as amended agreed to on division)
Liberal
NDP
Pierre Nantel NDP Longueuil—Saint-Hubert, QC
Yes. It's very well written, actually. We put a lot of time into this.
NDP
Pierre Nantel NDP Longueuil—Saint-Hubert, QC
You're fully aware of this.
On page 1, LIB-10.1, which refers to what we can now call clause 24.1, is a very good, very well-spirited resolution.
Wayne Long Saint John—Rothesay, Lib.
Madam Chair, I would like to change “The Office may” to “The Office must” in both paragraphs.