The problem with that is that I would be engaging in debate, because it is admissible. The reason I started by talking about the amendment is that I was ruling it inadmissible. I could probably go as far as saying that BQ-26(N) replaces lines 12 and 13 on page 9, but that's probably not going to help you much. I can't engage in the introduction of it because we have to keep moving with what is admissible and keep voting on it.
I apologize, Mr. Rayes. As I said, I'll take this up with.... Actually, if everyone could give me a few minutes, let me clarify that. I'll see how far I can go on this. I apologize for the delay, folks.
Go ahead, Mr. Rayes.