Ms. Tait, when we talk about the role of a public broadcaster, we need to talk about its mandate.
You're not Bell Media. We had Bell Media representatives in front of this committee, and they made it very clear that they were putting profit ahead of local journalism. CBC has an obligation to ensure that regions across our country, including northern Canada, have the voices they deserve.
There's no better example of the damage that's been caused than the deeply cynical treatment of the CBC position here in northern Manitoba. The last time you came to our committee, you mentioned how pleased you were that the CBC had filled the position. What was not known to us was that it had been filled for two months as a secondment. We no longer have anybody here, after years of not having anybody here.
CBC's mandate is to ensure that somebody services CBC North Country. This means that 85,000 people across Manitoba no longer have a voice through the CBC and haven't had one for years.
I contrast that with the leadership of Hubert Lacroix, the previous president, with whom I worked. He listened to our communities. He listened to people saying that we needed a CBC voice, and he made sure that our station stayed open. Under your leadership, we've seen the opposite, with a cynical play at the last committee meeting to say that you had filled the position, when in fact it was only for a couple of months.
My questions are these: What were the bonuses for? Where is the commitment to regional broadcasting when regions like ours are back to being a media desert when it comes to the CBC? What are the bonuses for, exactly, when you're not fulfilling the mandate that the CBC has in terms of regional broadcasting? Why should Canadians believe that the CBC matters when you consistently leave regions like ours in the dark?