Evidence of meeting #23 for Canadian Heritage in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was crtc.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Aimée Belmore
Peter Menzies  As an Individual
Troy Reeb  Executive Vice-President, Broadcast Networks, Corus Entertainment Inc.
Brad Danks  Chief Executive Officer, OUTtv Network Inc.
Jérôme Payette  Executive Director, Professional Music Publishers' Association
Morghan Fortier  Chief Executive Officer, Skyship Entertainment Company
Michael Geist  Canada Research Chair of Internet and E-commerce Law, Professor of Law, University of Ottawa, As an Individual
Kevin Waugh  Saskatoon—Grasswood, CPC
Lisa Hepfner  Hamilton Mountain, Lib.
Cathay Wagantall  Yorkton—Melville, CPC
Chris Bittle  St. Catharines, Lib.
Tim Uppal  Edmonton Mill Woods, CPC
Michael Coteau  Don Valley East, Lib.
Ted Falk  Provencher, CPC
Tim Louis  Kitchener—Conestoga, Lib.
Irene Berkowitz  Senior Policy Fellow, Audience Lab, The Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, As an Individual
Alain Saulnier  Author and Retired Professor of Communication from Université de Montréal, As an Individual
Bill Skolnik  Co-Chair, Coalition for the Diversity of Cultural Expressions
Nathalie Guay  Executive Director, Coalition for the Diversity of Cultural Expressions
Eve Paré  Executive Director, Association québécoise de l'industrie du disque, du spectacle et de la vidéo
Matthew Hatfield  Campaigns Director, OpenMedia
Kirwan Cox  Executive Director, Quebec English-language Production Council
Kenneth Hirsch  Co-Chair, Quebec English-language Production Council
Randy Kitt  Director of Media, Unifor
Olivier Carrière  Assistant to the Quebec Director, Unifor
Marie-Julie Desrochers  Director, Institutional Affairs and Research, Association québécoise de l'industrie du disque, du spectacle et de la vidéo

1:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

Thank you, Mr. Uppal. I think you only have a few seconds left.

1:55 p.m.

Edmonton Mill Woods, CPC

Tim Uppal

That's fine, then. Thank you.

1:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

Thank you very much.

I now go to the Liberals for five minutes.

We have Chris Bittle.

1:55 p.m.

St. Catharines, Lib.

Chris Bittle

Thank you so much, Madam Chair.

Dr. Berkowitz, in a study in 2020, you indicated, “Canadian creators are rocking it on YouTube.” In the study, you say, “70% of channels eligible for monetization (minimally requiring 1,000 subscribers) reported earning some form of revenue. From this group of eligible YouTubers who earn revenue, 60% generate $10,000 or less.” Is that correct?

1:55 p.m.

Senior Policy Fellow, Audience Lab, The Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, As an Individual

Dr. Irene Berkowitz

I think you are quoting from the Watchtime Canada 2019 study.

1:55 p.m.

St. Catharines, Lib.

Chris Bittle

Perhaps. I could be. That's why I'm asking. It's from 2019, not 2020.

1:55 p.m.

Senior Policy Fellow, Audience Lab, The Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, As an Individual

1:55 p.m.

St. Catharines, Lib.

Chris Bittle

When you say 60% of 70%, does that mean 30% of eligible channels earn $0? How are we dividing up this number if that's not correct?

1:55 p.m.

Senior Policy Fellow, Audience Lab, The Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, As an Individual

Dr. Irene Berkowitz

We updated that during the pandemic, so you may be quoting from a CMF article that I co-wrote.

We found that there were 160,000 Canadian entrepreneurs on YouTube. Only 25% of those, or 40,000, are part of the partner program and eligible, as you mentioned, for monetization. We only measured the monetization of those channels, so it would be the per cent of the per cent.

I'm not sure if I'm clarifying—

1:55 p.m.

St. Catharines, Lib.

Chris Bittle

That was 40,000 out of 160,000.

1:55 p.m.

Senior Policy Fellow, Audience Lab, The Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, As an Individual

1:55 p.m.

St. Catharines, Lib.

Chris Bittle

Three-quarters of them earn nothing.

1:55 p.m.

Senior Policy Fellow, Audience Lab, The Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, As an Individual

Dr. Irene Berkowitz

A lot of them are struggling and it's interesting. We found that in the Canadian YouTube revenue picture—there is also a chart in the study about that—most Canadian YouTubers have a revenue mix of brand deals, pan-media, other books, etc. Fascinatingly, a number of channels that aren't even eligible for the partner program report revenue based on these alternate sources of revenue. They are—

1:55 p.m.

St. Catharines, Lib.

Chris Bittle

I'm sorry. If I can interrupt.... I have a limited amount of time.

1:55 p.m.

Senior Policy Fellow, Audience Lab, The Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, As an Individual

1:55 p.m.

St. Catharines, Lib.

Chris Bittle

If a very small portion of Canadians are earning revenue on YouTube, most of them in that small percentage are making less than $10,000. How can we say that they are “rocking it”, when they're making less than the median income of a traditional artist?

1:55 p.m.

Senior Policy Fellow, Audience Lab, The Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, As an Individual

Dr. Irene Berkowitz

We also have 15% earning.... Let me get these numbers for you.

1:55 p.m.

St. Catharines, Lib.

Chris Bittle

It's 15% earning more than $50,000, but that's 15% of 25%. That is what you're telling us.

1:55 p.m.

Senior Policy Fellow, Audience Lab, The Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, As an Individual

Dr. Irene Berkowitz

Yes. I also think that this is a very new platform. We're only talking about 15 years of this amount of economic activity. I think that Canadians are rocking it on YouTube. They are the number one exporters of 91 countries, and there is an exuberance to keep growing this new world way of earning money.

Remember, this only relates to YouTube, not TikTok, Instagram or the other platforms.

1:55 p.m.

St. Catharines, Lib.

Chris Bittle

TikTok doesn't pay its Canadian artists.

Moving on, there was a study from the United States, “Time to Face the Influencer Pay Gap”, which showed a substantial gap between by BIPOC creators and white creators. There's a 29% difference. Again, this is in the United States. If you focus on just white and Black influencers, it winds up to a 35% difference.

Have you encountered in your study at all the substantial difference between Black, indigenous and persons of colour versus white creators, and how that works? That's all under the scope of YouTube earning about $29 billion in ad revenue last year.

2 p.m.

Senior Policy Fellow, Audience Lab, The Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, As an Individual

Dr. Irene Berkowitz

I'll say that YouTube has no information about the off-platform revenue, so we wouldn't know that, but we love the diversity picture on YouTube and that is obviously something that needs more study. That is very concerning, but we have Notorious Cree, Evan Fong and Lilly Singh, who's gorgeous.

2 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

Thank you. We're out of time.

I'm going now to the Bloc Québécois and Martin Champoux for two and a half minutes.

2 p.m.

Bloc

Martin Champoux Bloc Drummond, QC

Thank you, Madam Chair.

Ms. Guay, we've heard a lot about trust in the CRTC and its oversight of online broadcasting. You, yourself, said it was necessary to strengthen that trust.

Last week, Ian Scott said it was important to distinguish between regulating the Internet and regulating online broadcasting or distribution activities.

Do you think the CRTC has the tools to make that distinction?

How can we convince the public to trust the CRTC in this situation?

2 p.m.

Executive Director, Coalition for the Diversity of Cultural Expressions

Nathalie Guay

Thank you for your question.

The CRTC has been regulating broadcasting activities for decades, and I am sure that it will find a way to do the same online. It's a matter of time.

A number of experts have made suggestions on how to do that, including Pierre Trudel. I think we should look to the future with confidence on that front because it's certainly not an insurmountable challenge. I think the CRTC can do it.

The issue of trust has come up repeatedly, and of course, numerous challenges will have to be met. We have a suggestion. The current legislation lays out an appeal mechanism, a meaningful counterbalance that could help reassure people who do not trust the CRTC or people like us, who want to ensure that the ability to petition the Governor in Council remains intact—

2 p.m.

Bloc

Martin Champoux Bloc Drummond, QC

Last year, I actually proposed an amendment to extend that to the orders, but it was rejected.

How can we convince the Liberals and Conservatives who rejected the amendment last year to be more amenable to the idea this year?