What I was trying to say is that algorithms are theoretically content agnostic. They react to how people are engaging with content. They have profiles of who people are, and they try to serve that content up to other people. I will say that I am all for algorithmic transparency. I think we should be having conversations about what goes into an algorithm and how it works. I just know that artificially manipulating them is not going to work. That's a terrible idea for a number of reasons, but there also is no....
If we take YouTube as an example, this is machine learning and AI. While to my colleague's point, there might have been biases to put into it, but we're not going to be able to call “Mr. Algorithm” before the CRTC and ask him how this all works. There are too many things that go into it. I wish it were different, quite frankly. I guess we'll see. I do support algorithmic transparency, though.