It's a really interesting position to be in, to be honest, where there are two diametrically opposed positions of exactly what's in the bill and what's not in the bill. It's kind of difficult. By the letter of the legislation, UGC is in the bill. We haven't seen the policy directive. We don't know what the policy directive's going to say, and policy directives can change with another government and another heritage minister, whenever. It really leaves us in an uncomfortable position of uncertainty around our work and our line of business, and I don't think that's fair. All we've been asking for is to be written into the legislation to reflect what the minister is saying, and I don't think that should be a difficult lift. Honestly, I cannot tell why those clauses are still in there. They benefit nobody.
I would like to say, in my time, in the spirit of co-operation, that I agree with everything Margaret McGuffin is saying. I think the platform should support all of these education programs and we should be putting in accelerators. We should be lighting a fire, pouring gasoline on the fire, as opposed to dampening it, but you don't need discovery for any of that. That doesn't make any sense to me.
That's a long way of answering your question.