Good afternoon, sir.
A great deal of work has been done, yes. Some worthwhile measures were announced in the 2021‑22 budget, but they were generally not used properly.
I mentioned to you that the major festivals and events support initiative had some problems. That $200 million is not entirely living up to its promise, and the other $200 million, which includes support for local festivals, among other things, remains inaccessible. So there is an issue. It's been just about one year since this budget was tabled, and the funds are not yet available. I don't understand what's going on.
Of course, the public health issues remain as well. Everyone knows that all the necessary steps are being taken, but I'd also like to make the case for science. Science and the precautionary principle led us to cancel festivals and events in the first years, but now we know that the risks are low outdoors. Again recently, a study by the University of Colorado and Oxford University found that even large outdoor gatherings present no inordinate risk, especially if those gatherings are in provinces that have a vaccine passport calling for three doses, as will be the case in Quebec.
So it's a combination of things. We need to consider both government and public health measures to remove the stigma from arts and entertainment, as my colleague was saying. We know that the risks are low outdoors. The same thing goes for indoors, and we can have indoor shows because patrons wear masks in performance venues. So we have no reason to be completely shut down at this time. We know that in France, in particular, the cultural sector is alive and well, and it is in Belgium too. I don't see why that wouldn't be true here in Canada right now.