There isn't one, but under the bill, the decisions that are made are the ones indicated in the bill. If we say, for example, that the CRTC makes a decision on orders, it's a decision on orders.
Of course, there is no definition of what that decision is. However, by broadening the definition of the word “decision” to include “any measure of any kind taken by the Commission”, we are saying that it can be anything and everything. It could be that decision, but it could also be a number of other decisions that are not mentioned in the bill. That's why your amendment was ruled out of order.
Since the chair has ruled the amendment out of order, I can't debate it with you, and the committee can't debate it unless we appeal the ruling.