In addressing your first question about timeliness, one of the things we try to build into all of our questions in our public hearings—and we've had, as we said, 15 consultations before, major public hearings—is to try to find out whether anyone has a sense of how things are evolving and has ideas so that we can have rules that will work not just today but in five years. I think we've built up a very interesting public record on that.
Participating in our processes have been Canadian storytellers and a diverse number of artists, but also foreign streamers and academics. It's been crucial for us—and I think for the chairperson or colleagues who, as members of the tribunal, will be voting on this—to hear that this is where people think the industry is going but that no one knows for sure, and therefore that we need to be very careful as we make rules, so they do not have unintended consequences.
I think that, in asking those questions, we've built a record and we believe we'll be able to issue decisions that will have enough flexibility for the future, so that we won't paint ourselves into a corner or create something that will be unsustainable for private sector companies.