I would classify this as the Matt Green motion, and that's a compliment. It's just something for clarity.
We talked with one of the clerks earlier. I think it's important that as a committee we know where we stand, what the process should be if we have some need to compel witnesses to actually answer questions, and how we go about doing that. What does parliamentary privilege actually mean when it comes to this committee and what that all looks like?
Again, I think it's quite self-explanatory. Then we will have a better understanding of where we have to go should witnesses who come forward refuse to answer questions.