I'm going to take you back to some questioning from my colleague Mr. Green with regard to intelligence. You used the words “strategic intelligence”.
You know that the threshold for the government's invocation of this—that's not your responsibility—is threats to national security. You came out on February 6 or February 7 and indicated that you believed it was a national security threat. I don't know what happened on those days that would have caused you to believe that. Hopefully, you will tell us that, if you can.
It flies in the face of what Superintendent Morris has told the inquiry. He said that there was no credible intelligence to support a national security threat. When you look at how the act is written, “threats to the security of Canada” has a meaning assigned under section 2 of the CSIS Act.
Did you see, or were you aware of any intelligence that supported espionage or sabotage against Canada, or that was detrimental to the interests of Canada?