I will interrupt you there, Ms. Thomas.
Actually, if you listen to the testimony of the person who drafted this, Perrin Beatty, he did say that they used section 2 specifically because of how carefully it was drafted and relied upon.
Would you say, for this broader interpretation that was relied upon, that you relied upon it in the advice you gave to cabinet? Was it clear to cabinet that this interpretation did not align with the letter of the law as included in the Emergencies Act?