I want to clarify something you said earlier. We know, from the Official Languages Act in subsection 14(2), that a witness can appear in the language of their choice and that the hearing of witnesses in the official language of their choice shouldn't be disadvantaged.
You made a comment about evidence, that you weren't sure that evidence needs to be unilingual only under the Canada Evidence Act. Did I misunderstand you, or can you clarify your understanding of the provision about providing evidence to a commission, in this case, and whether or not it was only required to be unilingual, or does it have to be bilingual?