Fair enough, but as we've seen in the order by the House, it does not limit that scope. It just basically repeats the Emergencies Act in section 62 as being “the exercise of powers” and “the performance of duties”, and that's what it's the responsibility of the committee to review.
To ask again, in order to do that and to do that appropriately, to make sure this committee understands that the discharge of its responsibilities is not just to the House, but to the nation and to Canadians who are watching this, and it's a matter of having full transparency and full accountability for the actions of government, for the actions of the House, would it not then seem reasonable that we would take a very broad approach to a scope and mandate to ensure that there was nothing left out, to ensure that no questions were unanswered?