Yes, I bet you will, Glen, with a 60-second clock.
I have a clock here. Feel free to match yours to mine, and we'll take it from here. That being said, the clock has begun.
Mr. Dufresne, in your remarks you talked about legislative interpretation. I think you referenced the Supreme Court. My remarks reflected on a similar principle, that if legislation was “ambiguous”—and in fact, I said it so many times that I couldn't even pronounce the word correctly—we ought to have a liberal interpretation of it.
Would both of you care to comment on what I think is an important principle of law that we're wrestling with right now, since we have before us legislation that provides some ambiguity?