Out of the 9,000 STRs that we get in a week, there are often and always reports that would lead to suspicions of IMVE. However, I think there's a distinction between somebody who may be supportive of ideologically motivated violent extremism and the event itself. It wasn't that the event was funded in view of supporting IMVE activities. There may have been individuals who may have been involved who have those types of leanings and we would have received STRs on them regardless of whether or not the emergency measure orders were in place.
We don't, as I mentioned earlier, see all transactions. The reporting that we receive in STRs are reports that the institutions suspect would be relevant to money-laundering or terrorist-financing investigation. Once we get those reports, we do not simply disclose all of those STRs. We have to still meet our own threshold, which is different, because we have a different threshold as professional intelligence analysts. Once we meet our threshold to suspect that it would be relevant to a money-laundering or terrorist-financing investigation, that is when we would put together the financial intelligence to disclose it.
We do not see all individual transactions.