Okay.
In your opening remarks, you indicated that the situations at various border crossings, including Emerson and Coutts, were resolved using existing legislation.
My question then is do you really believe that the situation involving the “freedom convoy” was a national emergency that required the government's invocation of the Emergencies Act? Do you believe the situation couldn't be resolved with any other existing law in the country and that invoking the act was necessary, legal and met the threshold, yes or no?