That is fine with me if all the members of this committee agree to it. However, I'd simply like to say that we certainly don't need three hours to examine the motions. I think we could get everything done in an hour and a half.
The possibility of the committee not hearing from witnesses and concluding its discussions of the motions after an hour, or an hour and a half, bothers me. The meeting would end early. I don't understand why we would do that.
If Mr. Fortin prefers another approach, where, for example, we would begin by discussing the motions and then hear from another witness, I would agree with that. Minister Blair is not available during the second part of our meeting, but other witnesses may be. If time permits, we could hear from them.
I find it unfortunate that we would finish dealing with the motions in an hour and not do anything after that.