Thank you very much.
We've found already so far in this study that there's pretty widespread agreement around the table that whatever our positions around transitioning to a different kind of energy economy might be, suddenly shutting off a significant amount of the current supply is not going to go well, not just for the industry, but for all the people who work in that industry and the people who depend on that product for their business and heating their homes and wherever else that product ultimately lands.
This committee has been struck. We've been tasked with reporting on this Line 5 issue on a very short timeline, but given the amount of agreement around the table so far in terms of what Canada's position should be, and given that it seems that it is in fact the position of the Government of Canada, I'm just wondering.... It takes a lot of resources to have a committee and a study like this. Is there anything the Government of Canada, in your opinion, ought to be doing or should commit to doing that it's not already doing? Is there anything this committee ought to be doing or could do in order to impact a decision that is ultimately clearly within the jurisdiction of the United States at whatever level, whether that ends up being at the federal level or the state level?