Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Thank you to our witnesses. It's nice to see some familiar faces.
Just before this esteemed panel, we had the pleasure of hearing from Enbridge. During the testimony, we heard that there were very productive conversations between Enbridge and Premier Ford and between Enbridge and Premier Legault, and that both premiers were very supportive of the project and, of course, of Line 5. We heard similar things regarding the conversations between Enbridge and Minister Freeland, Minister Garneau, Minister O'Regan and other high-level officials from our government, and we certainly heard about the support of our government for keeping Line 5 in operation.
What we also heard from Enbridge—and I'm quoting here—is that they are looking and are very hopeful for “a mediated and negotiated diplomatic solution that takes us out of the hands of the court”.
I was wondering if I could have the comments of Ms. Greenwood in particular in terms of what the question really relates to, because in addition to all these government officials working hard on this case, of course, we know that the Detroit and Michigan chambers of commerce are also very much supportive of keeping Line 5 open.
My question is, how can you, as a chamber of commerce, work hand in glove with American chambers of commerce in order to achieve a successful “negotiated diplomatic solution” between our two countries?