That question cuts to the core of politics and the ways of electoral reform. Electoral reforms tend to be stickier, in other words, producing longer lasting results if they have a stronger buy-in. The more inclusive the input, not only are you better informed, but the greater the transparency and the legitimacy of the process.
If I'm asked that question, my dollar is on creating citizen assemblies. There are different ways of doing that. You don't have to poll people, but you can organize creatively. There is fascinating literature that actually looks at how citizen assemblies.... We are familiar with British Columbia in Canada, but they are also in Europe, in Holland, for example. It is sort of the increasingly more preferred way, if you will, or one increasingly more preferred way of doing it, and there are reasons for that. You create more opportunities for public education. Not just the 12 people you mentioned, but a broader segment of the population would really understand the nuances. It also gives greater opportunity to dispel fears about various systems.