Okay.
There's a different way in which the electoral system would be seen as being important by people. I wanted to run through an impressionistic view I've had of public opinion, based on our hearings, reading your polls and the polls of other firms, and the consultations we've been engaged in. I want to see if you think, based on the data you have available to you, whether I'm potentially getting close to the mark or missing the mark.
It seems to me, first of all, that Canadians as a whole, both those who think electoral reform is a good idea and those who think it's a bad idea, those who would rank it high and those who would rank it low, all of them regard the electoral system as being of foundational importance, effectively part of the Constitution in the sense that the British refer to the Constitution as a foundational part of the system, whether it has protection under our amending formula or not. Second, there is not an actual majority in favour of change. There's a wide division. Third, among those who do want change, proportionality is strongly favoured over non-proportional options. Effectively, those who want change want proportional representation, but within that subset of the population, there is no strong preference for one or another of the proportional models.
Does that sound roughly like an accurate view of where Canadians are, from what you can see?