I'm just going to say this and then open it up to thoughts from anybody else. The motion that we agreed to in principle, unanimously, was that we would do.... An FSDA strategy and act have jumped ahead; we thought that was going to be third. I actually thought when I heard the comments around the room that we were looking to complete those first two before we moved on to anything else. The strategy got jumped in there. I agree that it wiggled its way in, so why can't we wiggle something else in?
I really do want to hear from the other representatives around the table about what we want to do. I don't mind, but I'm just mindful that we will then have three things on the go. I mean, hey, we're a great committee, and there's a lot we can do, but we'll have three things in process, and it gets to be a bit of a challenge with witnesses and staying with the thought and the theme. As you're listening to witnesses and staying cohesive in your thinking and then you start bringing in yet another big project that we're looking at, it might get more challenging for everybody to keep aligned with what's happening in the different work packages that we're trying to do.
Does anybody else have any comments? Those are just mine.
Mr. Aldag.