Do we all agree on the two aspects we're trying to understand?
One is that balance between visitors.... We heard that in the witness statements. You have that interest in the mandate letters to increase people coming to the parks, and then the balance with the ecological integrity of the parks. There's that, and how that's being met in certain places.
I thought the first nations discussions we had were very enlightening. Obviously, there's a lot more to learn that we need to incorporate as we move forward on this.
Do we all agree that those two would be our goals?