I have just one point. If the real goal is to improve the environment, I think that either removing “toxic” or creating some other category to put things in so you're not arguing about that all the time would definitely speed up the process of getting things done, because then you could get to the issue rather than argue about the label. It may take a little bit of time to shake out what “toxic” means and doesn't mean, but as far as getting improvements made, I think it would improve the process.
On September 26th, 2006. See this statement in context.