Ms. Coombs, let's take the case of glass cleaner. It certainly is labelled as toxic in terms of “Don't drink this.” I mean, you have a little skull and crossbones, little things that tell you not to touch the stuff and not to let small children get their mitts on it. I don't understand why, when we put on warnings that it would be a very bad thing to drink this or to leave around small children--we even use the skull and crossbones and other such identifiers--this is less insulting or less misleading than for it to be referred to as toxic. I mean, clearly it's toxic; we do that for consumers all the time.
So I don't understand why suddenly there are these gradations of stigmatization.