Mr. Chair, I want to make one brief statement. There's been a lot of wilful disinformation about the subject of hot air, which is really a kind of short form for deindustrialization in eastern Europe. As the commissioner's team has confirmed, nobody on the government side ever advocated for a reduction of hot air as defined as deindustrialization in eastern Europe.
Secondly, it is illegal to do so under the Kyoto Protocol.
Thirdly, there is a wilful confusion between that hot air, which has this sort of connotation to it, and the climate fund, which was designed, as the commissioner's team said, to deal with emission trading systems domestically and internationally. I note that the commissioner is nodding.
Fourthly, there is a different thing, the clean development mechanism, overseen by Kyoto, which is to assist developing countries reduce greenhouse gas reductions. Hot air is simply that, hot air. It never was part of the plan. It's never been audited. It doesn't exist.
I have the following question for you, Commissioner. You say that new targets have to be set. You say at the same time efforts have to be redoubled. Without telling us what the target is, what is the mechanism by which we set new targets, which takes into account that we're not doing business as usual but we're redoubling efforts? What is a reasonable strategy--I speak in the abstract--for setting a new target so that we will have a better chance of success?