I have a question for Mr. Rutherford or Mr. Stone. Is not part of the impetus for a bill like this that it be a contribution to Canada's international reputation and ability to negotiate the second round? As Mr. Villeneuve says, this is a dress rehearsal.
Kyoto, as dour as industry painted it to be, was not actually what is needed. There's something quite a bit more.
Is there not some effort to re-establish Canada's battered image with respect to climate change?