The initial intention was that this would be in conjunction with Mr. McGuinty's motion. I don't know if I've heard Mr. McGuinty's opinion yet, but regardless, I've heard the committee's opinion that it's stretching the bounds of a friendly amendment.
The problem with waiting...because there is a precedent for this. We have done this before during committee business.
This motion is not extensive or long or complicated. It's very direct, and it's based on a very serious letter from the Auditor General of Canada, not--