Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'll start off with this question. Basically, there's been a common theme with all the witnesses we've seen. In this review, I think what we're looking for is a focused, effective, and efficient review of CEPA. We don't want to tear it apart and rebuild it--at least that's my understanding. Most of what we've heard as a very common theme is that the act essentially is a good act. What it lacks is implementation and enforcement, and a bit of clarity.
Notwithstanding the very few suggestions that you've made, would you agree that the act is essentially a good act?