I think I tried to be very specific in the brief we sent on the very few issues that we see are essential to fix in a focused review. I'll very briefly summarize.
On the stigma issue, take the word “toxic” out of the act. On the climate change issue, do not regulate greenhouse gases under a section that was designed to deal with toxic substances. Either deal with them in the international air pollution provisions, which the previous government never used—what are they for, in the bill, if not for this?—or use the Clean Air Act.
On the narrow issue about limits of quantification that I described, we suggested in our November 25 brief a very specific fix for that, modelled on what was done in the Stockholm POPs convention.
We suggested some strengthening in the administrative duties so that departments actually do what they're supposed to do. We've suggested, for better information, that departments be mandated to have state of the environment and state of health reports, and we've suggested a change in the timeframe.