From our industry's perspective, a couple of the areas we pointed to where we would like to see improvements actually do relate specifically to where we find the act either restrictive or wasteful. On the idea that, like Australia, we have an ability to recognize and adopt assessments in other countries, if that were implemented in our legislation we think it would make it more efficient and less restrictive, so to speak.
On the requirement that these limits of quantification have to be developed for things that are put on the virtual elimination list, even if it's only for something that's a contaminant, if it's there at irrelevant levels in a product, I think that's overly restrictive. Now, that hasn't hit us yet, because so few things have been put on the virtual elimination list, but eventually that will be a problem.
As we get more into working with the provinces as we deal with climate change and/or clean air, if that's done under this legislation, the problems in the equivalency provisions in the legislation will start to cause great restrictions. The kind of thing that Justyna was talking about will really start to hit.