On your first question, I did address that a bit while you were out, but briefly, we think that cooperation with the provinces is going to become more and more important on issues like climate change and clean air. We'll need to make sure there are provisions in the equivalency part that don't stand in the way of using provincial approaches that are somewhat different from the federal approaches. We believe there needs to be an in-depth review of that by the committee. We don't think the answers you received from Environment Canada on this on Monday should be the end of the story. We believe that should be looked at more thoroughly.
On the virtual elimination issue, we have proposed a very narrow amendment in this area. As I said, it's to try to adopt the practical approach that was taken in the Stockholm convention so that this requirement for doing LOQs was only done in areas where it was needed and not when it wasn't needed.
Going beyond that and amending the provisions more fully.... There was an awful lot of time spent on CEPA 1999 on this issue. It was very divisive. I don't think that would be a good thing to get into.
I do think the question Mr. Cullen asked is a good one. Why isn't there anything on the list? I don't know the answer to that. I don't believe it's because the provisions don't support adding things to the list.