I'll give you an example. One of our members has a program with the community, the province, and a local health authority that involves a children's blood lead monitoring program for the surrounding communities. It's one of the few areas in the country where there is very good data on what the trend has been in children's blood lead. But they're not going to take samples or engage in monitoring in, say, Halifax, at the other end of the country. That isn't their role, and doing so would be completely inappropriate.
So yes, you do take responsibility where your impacts are, whether they are caused by your operations or your products. You do take responsibility, and you can generate information, but you can't generate information on background. You may, for example, want to know whether certain species are recovering or healthy or being impacted. And it may be that unknown stresses or substances you didn't even think about are at play. As Canadians, we need to know that kind of background information and whether the overall trends are improving, decreasing, and so on. You can't look at just the industry, because industry's not the only cause of the problem. So you need to look at both.