As I mentioned, in terms of actually changing the act or looking purely at where to change the act, we're really hesitant, because we think the implementation part is where there seem to be problems. As far as I know, this committee is not confined to only considering legislative change. I think it would be helpful if the committee itself looked at some of these broader questions of implementation and gave thought to where it could advise the government, maybe on non-legislative changes if it wished, and could maybe provide some clarification as to what the intent of the act was. That might help guide you further to where you want to make or not make legislative changes.
On May 17th, 2006. See this statement in context.