Thank you.
I have a very quick question. I've been trying to make some notes here and bring it together. To repeat, the recommendations are that we do not do clause-by-clause, but look at what's working, and I think you suggested seven different parts of CEPA we could focus on.
I'm looking at your brief, Mr. Lloyd, and you provided seven points here. The first deals with the management of climate change. Then you dealt with the term “toxic” and the stigma it carries, the requirement to establish so-called “limits of quantification”, state of the environment reporting, and so on. Are those your recommended points that we need to review in our CEPA review?