Thank you. That helps focus my question.
This act has had some life and experience with industry, new products being introduced to the market, processes going on, and money invested. What do you think about no chemicals actually having been listed for virtual elimination? Is there a presupposition that there aren't any chemicals in the Canadian manufacturing cycle that should be listed, or that the act hasn't been effectively applied? Sections 64, 65, and 66 of the act are designed so if a chemical is deemed toxic and should be eliminated--of that seriousness--we can in fact do it. That's part of the assurances.
With the act being this many years old and nothing having made the list, is this a paper tiger?