Mr. Lloyd, on the question around toxins, there was some suggestion by witnesses who appeared before the committee last year, when the government was doing its strange mechanism around Kyoto and some other things, that the application of the word “toxin” has in a sense been redefined under Kyoto.
I know it's not common parlance to refer to carbon dioxide as a toxin, but for the purposes of the act, there was some suggestion that removing the word “toxin” would undermine the government's ability to actually use CEPA, as in previous Supreme Court challenges when CEPA was first being introduced. The government's ability to use that as a tool was mostly focused on the sections you referred to. Is there any threat of that actually coming to pass?