I want to go back to one of the first points you made—I alluded to it moments ago—which is that the underlying technologies to proceed with CCS already exist. I think you said we should be using these tools; they're in the tool box, and they are one tool. As an adjunct member of the economics department and as a physicist, have you come across any analysis that compares, from an economic perspective, all the other shrink-wrapped technologies on the shelf right now, for example, that deal with conservation?
The Minister of Natural Resources is fond of saying that the best kilowatt hour, I think he talks about...I forget how he puts it; it's a slogan of some kind. I think what he alludes to is that the best we can do is move toward conserving consumption, as opposed to moving to generating more energy. Have you seen any analysis along those lines?
Canadians who are watching, listening, or reading these transcripts, would like to get a better sense of the best way to proceed. If the technologies are on the shelf for massive conservation, for example, and we're going to be using public dollars in one form or another through either tax credits or other incentives or direct contributions, are we in a position to draw a conclusion right now as to which way to go?