But if that's the idea, that our data is ready to go--and my understanding is it's ready to go--and the government for some reason isn't releasing it, I'll leave that for the government to answer.
If we're going to benchmark and we have the 2005 data ready to go, why are we using 2006 data as our baseline when our commitment internationally is 1990, a 6% reduction? And what I've heard today from my colleague is that we're going to be able to get below 6% by 2025. What's the rationale that's been given—not that you would have made it—to start with 2006 as a baseline? Why not 1990?