I understand what you are telling me, but what is the justification of a $900,000 expenditure to promote the climate change plan, when you determined that the One-Tonne Challenge Program of the previous government was ineffective and was not producing true reductions in greenhouse gas emissions?
What allows you to authorize an expenditure to promote an action plan that does not respect the Kyoto Protocol? Based upon departments' assessments, among others that of Treasury Board, you determined that the One-Tonne Challenge Program would not lead to the objectives being reached. How can you state today that this program, this advertising campaign, will allow Canadians to improve their environment, whereas the One-Tonne Challenge Program could not?