I guess mine is fairly to the point. Can we have a subamendment at this point? I was just going to say, after “further witnesses”, “possibly recommend”.
I think a lot of us are with you, Bernard, in respect to looking at this seriously. It's not an issue of a stand-off and trying to stall you on this, but it's an issue of actually wanting to get a bit more testimony and, as Nathan had pointed out, in terms of the alternatives and so on. So sooner than later.... But my commitment as a committee member as long as I'm on this committee is to bring the witnesses forward, and if that's where the evidence leads and there are decent alternatives, let's do it. This is above party interests.
So that's what I'm proposing as an amendment.