So the other suggestion earlier that Mr. McGuinty apologize to him, because he is in fact the one who has unilaterally changed things here in terms of the intent of the motion.... They got their day, but they've changed it in terms of the full intent of it. Is that not in order, then, for Mr. McGuinty's name to be inserted at that point?
On June 14th, 2007. See this statement in context.