That's right.
Welcome, Mr. Mulroney.
I was intrigued by something you said towards the end, which was the whole notion of the implicit acceptance of targets. Implicit is good, but sometimes explicit is better. There were really two going-in positions, I guess, by not only the German presidency but also a number of other countries. One was the whole question of being explicit about the ambition of not allowing global warming to get past 2° Celsius. I wonder if you can tell us a bit about the push-me, pull-me, the tug that took place on nailing that down. That is a fairly widely agreed-upon figure by scientists as well as some states.
The other explicit target that was put forward was the idea of an overall average reduction around the world of 50% vis-à-vis the 1990 target by 2050, which would implicitly mean that countries like Canada would have to do better in order to allow for a fair and differentiated burden being borne by developing countries. In other words, we'd have to get up closer to 80% to allow that 50% to take place with the help of developing countries.
Can you tell us why both of those more explicit targets failed to make it through?