So that's why it's important, as we're looking forward to a review, that we have enough time to ensure that it's done robustly. And the timing is important too, so that it can be integrated deep into the very departments themselves, so that we're guaranteeing our success, rather than pre-empting with one particular party's view on a bill, pre-empting that kind of spadework. I think that's the essence of why we need this type of review.
Is that why you recommended it, rather than legislation up front?