As much as it grieves me to interrupt the parliamentary secretary in this oration, the simple reading of the government's own propaganda document about their plan does not speak to the article we're dealing with right now.
We have voted on the amendment. We are establishing whether this clause should pass, and that is the debate we're incurring. Reading the government's plans is both off topic and a repetition of what has already been said.
If the government member would like to refer us to some other concern he has with this piece of the bill, then we'd look forward to that debate. But I respectfully submit that repeating the government's plans and intentions, as they've told us a number of times over the last five filibusters, is not on topic and is a repetition, both of which are meant to be out of order for the discussion.