I can recall the previous Minister of the Environment being before this committee and being pressed quite often about the rising greenhouse gases in Canada. At one point the answer was that the economy grew. That coupling of the environment, particularly a coupling of pollution and a growth in economy, is one that seems to exist in some places still as old-world thinking.
From my reflection on your presentation and also seeing Sweden on the world stage and your performance, you're in an enviable place, from the view of a Canadian citizen, in the sense that you have mirrored your politics and policy into a positive result, that you are attempting to achieve greenhouse gas reductions while growing the economy and making some attempts to become carbon neutral as a nation some time in the future.
The question was put earlier by my colleague about the way this was crafted through. We've heard from the Canadian government time and again that there's a silo effect, that the Department of Finance might not be listening to the Department of Transport and Transport not listening to Environment, and in general the environment department losing out and the environment minister being unable to make the changes required.
Can you point to one or two specific things you've done to overcome the silo effect?