Certainly that is a very interesting question. As I mentioned in my speech, it's quite a balancing act between economic development, social development, and environmental departments. We must try to strike the balance among the three. We have different groups that are not necessarily in accordance with other groups concerning, let's say, social development, environmental development, or economic development.
But as an example of what we've done in New Brunswick, as you've seen, in Penobsquis we've made sure that we provide water for people who do not have any water at this time, because there was a problem with the mine, etc.
I'm not sure exactly what your question was, but what I can tell you is that to me there cannot be any sustainable economic development if you don't have the other two, if you don't have social development and environmental development. And you can't have environmental development if you don't have social development and economic development. This is the perfect trio, I would say.