That's unfortunate, because it's quite a good document that addresses Bill C-469.
Mr. Scarpaleggia asked you some questions I was going to ask, so that leaves one big question for me. You told him you are open to amendments to exempt hospitals, for example. You're open to amending the amount from zero to 0.5%, which is in harmony with what's happening in Quebec, Manitoba, and a number of U.S. states.
Mr. Scarpaleggia asked why you were moving forward with this if it is by regulation. I believe you said you felt the legislation would be better than regulation. The report outlines the difference, and there is almost no difference between going with regulation versus legislation. You can accomplish the same thing.
So you're aware that the government introduced a notice of intent to regulate in February. If the same result can happen through regulation or legislation, and the process has already begun and likely will be completed before the legislation, why would you continue to move forward?